Guidance Document Database

A plan that in practice met the criteria for tax qualification for five years prior to its termination date was covered under Title IV at plan termination.

Addresses the bond / escrow requirements of section 4204 of ERISA which, if satisfied along with the other 4204 requirements, mean that a sale of assets by a contributing employer will not constitute a withdrawal from a multiemployer plan.

Plan meets the Governmental plan coverage exemption.

Addresses whether the construction industry exception to withdrawal applies where a contractor's CBA expires, its employees do not perform any more work for which the contractor was previously required to make contributions, but the contractor subcontracts for the performance of such work.

Government contractors are not excluded from PBGC coverage.

Addresses the meaning of the term "the unfunded vested benefits attributable to employees of the employer" for purposes of the cap on the unfunded vested benefits attributable to employees of an employer that sold substantially all of its assets to an unrelated buyer.

State liability with respect to private-sector plans to which employees contribute.

PBGC is not authorized to waive interest charges on late premium payments.

Addresses whether a withdrawal would take place if a corporation transfers all of its assets to one of its divisions and whether a withdrawal occurs in the event of a stock sale if contributions to the plan continue.

Addresses the distribution of residual assets to an employer.

Addresses mass withdrawal generally, the effect of a "substantially all" mass withdrawal on the de minimis reduction and 20-year cap, and the meanings of "substantially all" and "agreement or arrangement".

PBGC disapproves proposed plans that an employer wishes to adopt because they would effect an impermissible continuation of terminated plans for which guaranteed benefits are being paid.

Addresses whether, based on an employer's date of withdrawal, that employer is subject to reallocation liability in the event of a mass withdrawal termination.

Advises that defined contribution plans which defined benefit features may be subject to coverage.

Addresses a question as to what constitutes a facility for purposes of determining what CBUs get excluded due to a pre-1980 closure of a facility.

Plan does not meet the Governmental plan exemption from coverage.

For a plan that is being divided into 18 plans, participants should not be double counted for the purpose of premiums.

Each participant is entitled to a share of the excess plan assets where the plan does not provide for return of excess assets to employer upon plan termination.

Discusses the difference between a multiemployer plan and a multiple employer plan and the termination provisions applicable to the latter.

This opinion letter declines to provide an opinion on the meaning of “substantially all” for the purposes of determining whether a substantially all mass withdrawal has occurred.

Addresses bond waivers and withdrawal liability and how regulations do not apply to the liquidation bond upon seller’s liquidation.

Addresses the calculation of guaranteed benefits; PBGC measures benefits using plan factors at date of plan termination.

Regards a statutory provision under which a contributing employer to a multiemployer plan does not withdraw from the plan because it ceases to exist due to a change in organizational form if there is no interruption in the employer's contributions or obligation to contribute; addresses whether that exception to withdrawal applies to an employer that sells its assets where the purchaser takes over the seller's name, plant, and employees.

A plan maintained by a company under contract to provide services for a Federal agency does not meet the Governmental plan coverage exemption.

$20 minimum in the regulation is not subject to actuarial adjustment for the participant’s age at the time the benefit started.