Skip to main content

Multiemployer

  • Opinion Letter 91-03

    Discusses and compares a seller's withdrawal liability risks and obligations pre-MPPAA and post-MPPAA, and whether an employer's failure to object to an estimate of withdrawal liability (for informational purposes) bars that employer from challenging that underlying estimate upon a subsequent actual assessment of withdrawal liability.

    • document
  • Opinion Letter 81-33

    Addresses the definition of “building and construction industry” and explains that the term should be given the same meaning as it has under the Taft-Hartley Act.

    • document
  • Opinion Letter 82-02

    Addresses what may constitute a complete or partial withdrawal from a multiemployer plan as a result of certain events occurring during contract negotiations; addresses the labor dispute exemption from withdrawal liability.

    • document
  • Opinion Letter 82-21

    Addresses whether certain types of labor disputes involving an employer’s employees would constitute a withdrawal from a multiemployer plan and specifically cites strikes and lockouts as examples.

    • document
  • Opinion Letter 85-17

    Addresses whether a seller and purchaser can retroactively bring a sale of assets within the coverage of the law by posting an appropriate bond and by amending the sales contract.

    • document
  • Opinion Letter 86-06

    Considers the timing of the bond/escrow requirement in a sale of assets and requests that PBGC grant a waiver of the bond/escrow and contract language requirements.

    • document
  • Opinion Letter 82-19

    When a defined benefit multiemployer plan merges into a defined contribution annuity plan, the multiemployer plan terminates; addresses the rules and procedures governing distribution of the assets of a terminated multiemployer plan.

    • document
  • Opinion Letter 82-33

    For a chain of food stores, a single store is ordinarily a “facility” for purposes of section 4217 of ERISA.

    • document
  • Opinion Letter 85-29

    Addresses whether certain corporate transactions would trigger withdrawals and discusses whether these corporate transactions may be disregarded under the evade or avoid provision of the law.

    • document