Skip to main content

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

Multiemployer

  • Opinion Letter 85-04

    Addresses how to reduce withdrawal liability for liability already assessed for a previous partial withdrawal. PBGC subsequently adopted a rule addressing the issue. (See 29 CFR part 4206.)

    • document
  • Opinion Letter 95-03

    Addresses calculation of partial withdrawal credit using the "modified presumptive method" where contributions are averaged over a 10-year period.

    • document
  • Opinion Letter 88-05

    Addresses the relevance of events occurring after a plan’s reallocation record date on the reallocation liability calculation.

    • document
  • Opinion Letter 82-34

    Under presumptive method, if a plan is fully funded because the value of plan assets never falls below liabilities, the plan would record a zero change in the value of unfunded vested benefits despite fluctuations in unfunded vested benefits.

    • document
  • Opinion Letter 91-02

    Addresses whether a qualified preretirement survivor annuity is a nonforfeitable benefit where the participant had not died as of the date of plan termination. Under the Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014, a qualified preretirement survivor annuity is not to be treated as forfeitable solely because the participant is alive on the date of multiemployer plan insolvency or termination.

    • document
  • Opinion Letter 81-41

    Discusses the definition of “employer” in the context of withdrawal liability and how it applies to a group of trades or businesses under common control; addresses the rules governing partial withdrawals.

    • document
  • Opinion Letter 86-05

    Addresses the transfer of surplus assets to another trust after plan termination.

    • document
  • Opinion Letter 89-08

    Addresses whether an employer may contractually modify its statutory withdrawal liability obligation to a multiemployer plan by assuming "additional liability", and the limitations of such a modification.

    • document
  • Opinion Letter 91-06

    Addresses trustees’ ability to adopt alternative withdrawal liability rules under ERISA sections 4219 and 4224 that modify an employer's withdrawal liability payment terms to take into account an employer's financial condition.

    • document