Opinion letters from PBGC’s Office of the General Counsel explain how the agency would apply Title IV of ERISA and regulations thereunder to a certain set of facts. PBGC opinion letters are stored in a database that contains all opinion letters issued by OGC since the establishment of PBGC in 1974.
You can search the database below by keyword, and filter to show only opinion letters currently in effect, or to include withdrawn letters.
| Title | Issue Date | Topics | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opinion Letter 82-020 | Withdrawal liability, Posting of security |
A letter of credit may satisfy the bond or escrow requirement of § 4203(d)(3)(B)(ii). |
|
| Opinion Letter 82-019 | Termination, Defined contribution plan, Individual account plan exemption |
PBGC has determined that the merger of the defined benefit plan into the individual account plan constitutes a termination of the defined benefit plan under § 4041A(a) and participants' nonforfeitable benefits under the defined benefit plan must be provided in accordance with Title IV. |
|
| Opinion Letter 82-018 | Coverage, Professional service employer plan |
Because over 50 percent of the Business's gross sales are derived from the sale of prescription drugs, and 51 percent of the Business's stock is owned by a licensed pharmacist, the exclusion from coverage for professional service employers under § 4021(b)(13) applies. |
|
| Opinion Letter 82-017 | Sale of stock, Withdrawal, Multiemployer plan |
Discusses whether the sale of stock constitutes a withdrawal from a multiemployer plan and whether the sale of assets rule applies. An employer shall not be considered to have withdrawn solely because of a change in corporate structure. |
|
| Opinion Letter 82-015 | Transfers, Withdrawal liability |
Addresses the rules governing the transfer of assets from multiemployer plan to single-employer plan; addresses the withdrawal liability consequences of transferring assets to a single employer plan. Provides that transfer of assets must be in compliance with the multiemployer plan's terms. |
|
| Opinion Letter 82-014 | Withdrawal liability, Sale of assets, Unfunded vested benefits |
Addresses the contribution periods used in calculating an employer’s allocable share of a multiemployer plan’s unfunded vested benefits for the last plan year ending before April 29, 1980. Allocations to the numerator are based on when obligation to contribute arose and not on when contributions are paid. |
|
| Opinion Letter 82-013 | Withdrawal liability | Discusses the definition of “employer” in the context of withdrawal liability and how it applies to a group of trades or businesses under common control. Indicates that there is joint and several liability for plan sponsors. |
|
| Opinion Letter 82-012 | Mergers, Multiemployer plan |
Provision for PBGC review in § 4231(c) is voluntary and provides a plan administrator with assurance that a proposed merger will not violate §§ 406(a) or 406(b)(2). PBGC must be given notice of the merger at least 120 days before the effective date of the merger and transaction must comply with § 4231(b). |
|
| Opinion Letter 82-011 | Restoration | Restoration of the Plan may be proper under § 4047. If multiple conditions listed in opinion letter are fulfilled, Plan may be restored to its earlier status. |
|
| Opinion Letter 82-010 | Multiemployer plan, Mass withdrawal |
PBGC's authorization of multiemployer plan's proposed distribution in full satisfaction of all nonforfeitable benefits under the Plan is not required. If a distribution is made in full satisfaction of all nonforfeitable benefits under the plan, plan must notify PBGC within 60 days thereafter, of the date of the distribution. |
|
| Opinion Letter 82-009 | Withdrawal liability | Discussion or what constitutes the building and |
|
| Opinion Letter 82-008 | Withdrawal liability | Meaning of "the unfunded vested benefits attributable to employees of the employer" in § 4225(a) does not refer to the same amount as the UVB allocable to an employer, under § 4211. |
|
| Opinion Letter 82-007 | Mergers and transfers | Based on facts, no Title IV liability to PBGC by the subsidiary or the proposed purchaser of the subsidiary's stock, when stock is being purchased under Title IV in the event that one or more of the plans were to terminate subsequent to the closing date. There is potential Title IV liability in connection with the new plans it establishes for its |
|
| Opinion Letter 82-006 | Termination | Validity of notice of intent to terminate discussed. |
|
| Opinion Letter 82-005 | Withdrawal liability | Discussion of rules governing partial withdrawals, including whether cessation of operations at a facility due to a shutdown will constitute a partial withdrawal. |
|
| Opinion Letter 82-004 | Withdrawal liability | No withdrawal liability solely as a result of a sale by a parent of stock of a subsidiary which was obligated to contribute to a multiemployer plan and continues such contributions after the sale. |
|
| Opinion Letter 82-003 | Coverage, Church plans, Premiums |
Plan is a church plan within the meaning of |
|
| Opinion Letter 82-001 | Coverage, Professional service employer plan |
Because the principal business of each corporation whose employees are covered by the Plan is vending prescription drugs, and the stock of each corporation is owned by pharmacists or corporations owned by pharmacists, the exclusion from coverage for professional service employers under § 4021(b)(13) applies. |
|
| Opinion Letter 81-041 | Withdrawal liability, Controlled group |
Discussion concerning definition of "employer" and circumstances relating to whether a complete or partial withdrawal occurred. A partial withdrawal occurs if there is a partial cessation of the employer's contribution obligation. Additionally, if certain entities are under the same common control they are considered the same employer under Title IV. |
|
| Opinion Letter 81-040 | Coverage, Governmental plan |
Plan sponsored by an entity that is not a governmental agency or instrumentality within the meaning of § 4021(b)(2) is not a governmental plan and thus is not excluded from coverage. |
|
| Opinion Letter 81-039 | Termination, Sufficiency |
Reviews circumstances under which a plan administrator may pay benefits in a single installment. |
|
| Opinion Letter 81-038 | Termination, Plan administrator |
Notice of Intent to Terminate is invalid where not issued by plan administrator. Company argued it was de facto plan administrator with authority to terminate, but Plan clearly identified Board of Administration as plan administrator. |
|
| Opinion Letter 81-037 | Coverage, Governmental plan |
Plan maintained by governmental instrumentality is a government plan and thus excluded from Title IV coverage. |
|
| Opinion Letter 81-036 | Reportable event, Employer liability |
Discussion of possible liability to the employer who sold its stock of a subsidiary which in turn will establish a new pension plan. |
|
| Opinion Letter 81-035 | Guaranteed benefits | This letter addresses the calculation of guaranteed benefits. PBGC measures benefits using plan factors at date of plan termination. |