| | 82-33 |
| | October 28, 1982 |
| | REFERENCE: |
| | 4217 Applicability of MPPAA to Certain Pre-1980 Withdrawals |
| | OPINION: |
| | This responds to your request for a written opinion from the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the "PBGC") regarding |
| | the meaning of the term "facility" as used in Section 4217 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| | ("ERISA"), as amended by the Multiemployer Act. |
| | Section 4217 of ERISA provides, in pertinent part, as follows: |
| | (a) For the purpose of determining the amount of unfunded vested benefits allocable to an employer for a partial or |
| | complete withdrawal from a plan which occurs after April 28, 1980, and for the purpose of determining whether there has |
| | been a partial withdrawal after such date, the amount of contributions, and the number of contribution base units, of such |
| | employer properly allocable-- |
| | (2) to work performed at a facility at which all covered operations permanently ceased before April 29, 1980, or for which |
| | there was a permanent cessation of the obligation to contribute before that date, |
| | shall not be taken into account. [29 U.S.C. § 1397(a)(2).] |
| | You have outlined an example in while a national food store chain maintained * * * retail food stores in a particular |
| | metropolitan area, closed * * * of these stores prior to April 29, 1980, and closed the remaining stores in 1982. You have |
| | requested our opinion how employer contributions to a multiemployer pension plan, allocable to work performed at the * * * |
| | stores which closed prior to April 29, 1980, would be treated under Section 4217. |
| | Under the Multiemployer Act the initial responsibility for determining whether any particular action constitutes a withdrawal |
| | from a multiemployer plan, and the amount of any liability resulting therefrom, lies with the plan sponsor. The Act further |
| | provides that any disputes between a plan sponsor and an employer on these issues are to be resolved first through |
| | arbitration and then, if necessary, in the courts. Given this scheme for enforcement of the Act, it would be inappropriate |
| | for the PBGC to interject itself in such a determination by issuing an opinion on the application of the law to particular |
| | transactions. The PBGC, however, will continue its practice of answering general interpretive questions regarding the Act. |
| | The question whether Section 4217 of ERISA applies to the closing of a single store, or only to the closing of a group of |
| | stores in a defined georraphical area, is such a general interpretive question. It is our opinion that the term "facility" in |
| | Section 4217 of ERISA, in the context of the retail food industry, ordinarily means a single store. Thus, a single retail food |
| | store which is permanently closed ordinarily would be "a facility at which all covered operations permanently ceased," |
| | within the meaning of Section 4217(a)(2) of ERISA, regardless of whether all of the retail food stores operated by a |
| | national chain in a given city were closed. However, there may be circumstances in which the plan sponsor may |
| | determine that a shift of operations from one location to another constitutes a continuation of operations at a facility. A |
| | dispute over such a determination would, as mentioned above, be subject to arbitration. |
| | This general interpretation of the term "facility" is consistent with an explanation in the legislative history of the meaning of |
| | the term for purposes of the partial withdrawal rule. In its report on a bill (H.R. 3904) which eventually became the |
| | Multiemployer Act, the Ways and Means Committee of the House of Representative stated that "[f]or purposes of partial |
| | withdrawal rules . . . the term means an economic unit, generally at a single physical location, where business is conducted |
| | or industrial operations are performed." H.R. Rep. No. 869, Part II, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. 18 (1980), reprinted in [1980] |
| | U.S. Code Cong. and Ad News 3007. |
| | I hope this information is of assistance to you. If you have any further questions, please telephone * * * of this office on |
| | (202) 254-4895, or write to him at the above address. |
| | Henry Rose |
| | General Counsel |